Protecting Rely On the Age of Deceptiveness
Your phone hums with a video message. It’s your child, speaking proficient French, smiling confidently as she provides what sounds like a genuine talk. There’s simply one issue– she doesn’t speak French. At the very least not beyond “bonjour” and “merci.”
You really feel a strange mix of amazement and worry. It’s her voice. Her quirks. Her face. However words? They were stitched together by an algorithm.
That single minute records the paradox of our AI-driven age. On one hand, generative AI dazzles us with its imaginative capabilities. On the other, it shakes the very foundation of trust. If we can no longer be sure whether a voice, a video clip, or even a heartfelt tale is human or equipment, what does that mean for society? For company? For democracy?
Isaac Asimov once gave us 3 straightforward rules– the 3 Regulations of Robotics — to think of how robots can safely exist side-by-side with people. But in 2025, those legislations feel insufficient. Today, the actual threat isn’t a humanoid robot turning fierce; it’s an unnoticeable algorithm posing people, spreading false information, or adjusting us without ever before needing to enter the physical world.
Which’s why it’s time to recommend something brand-new: a Fourth Legislation of Robotics.